At our clinic, Prof La Marca personally handles the method.Â
Endoscopic tubal recanalisation, where indicated, is today performed in only a few centres throughout Europe. Expertise is therefore concentrated in a limited number of experts capable of performing it correctly.
Â
Tubal occlusion causes female infertility in 30% of cases and in 10-25% the occlusion is localised in the proximal tubal tract (PTO) 1,2. The most common causes of PTO include pelvic inflammatory disease, salpingitis isthmica nodosa, endometriosis, tubal polyps and surgical trauma.
DIAGNOSIS OF TUBAL PATENCY
There are different approaches to the diagnosis of tubal factor infertility. The laparoscopy with salpingocromoscopy is considered the gold standard in the assessment of tubal patency3. A further oedoscopic approach for the study of tubal damage is the salpingoscopy4 which consists of the introduction of a rigid salpingoscope during laparoscopy into the distal part of the tubes, allowing visualisation of the mucosa of the tubal ampulla. Hysterosalpingography (HSG)consists of injecting, via a catheter, a contrast medium into the uterus and tubes. A potential limitation of HSG are false positives secondary to tubal spasms, which occur especially if the contrast medium is injected too quickly5
Sonohysterosalpingography (SHG)Â with contrast medium is an alternative to hysterosalpingography for the assessment of tubal patency. Although ultrasound images are inferior to those obtained by fluoroscopy, SHG is more sensitive and more specific than HSG in detecting tubal occlusion6,7.
TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL TUBAL OBSTRUCTION
Therapeutic approaches for the treatment of proximal tubal occlusion depend on the type and degree of tubal dysfunction. The previous techniques of laparotomy and microsurgery have been largely replaced by the advent of tubal catheterisation and selective, fluoroscopic and hysteroscopic salpingography8. In addition to being an effective method in the treatment of tubal obstruction, tubal catheterisation also allows for an indirect assessment of tubal function by measuring intratubar pressure at the time of cannulation. Indeed, the persistence of high pressure after catheter insertion inside the tube suggests reduced compliance of the tubal wall and is associated with very low rates of spontaneous post-procedural pregnancy.9. Up to 75-85% of obstructions can be treated by selective salpingography and tubal catheterisation with a recurrence rate of around 30%. Fluoroscopic tubal cannulation is a procedure that carries a minimal risk of radiation exposure and has the advantage of having a short and rapid learning curve10Â In a 2020 study conducted by Pyra, Szmygin et al. 248 PTO patients were treated with selective salpingography and tubal catheterisation with the 96% treatment efficacy 11. Hysteroscopic tubal cannulation allows visualisation of the entire uterine cavity and this may be useful in the diagnosis and simultaneous treatment of coexisting uterine pathologies. Tubal perforation is a possible procedural complication with a literature incidence rate of 3-11% but does not require treatment and heals spontaneously 12,13. In 2017, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 observational studies with 1720 patients undergoing tubal catheterisation for proximal tubal obstruction who attempted to conceive naturally after the procedure was prepared. The results of the analysis showed that in women with proximal fallopian tube obstruction, the chance of achieving a clinical pregnancy after tubal catheterisation is indeed high.
Bibliography
- Schlegel PN, Fauser BC, Carrel DT, Racowsky C. Biennial Review of Infertility, 3. Springer; 2013. p. 1-264.Â
- Serafini P, Batzofin J. Diagnosis of female infertility: a comprehensive approach. J Reprod Med 1989;34:29 40.Â
- Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Beurden M, Redekop WK, Bossuyt PM. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1995;3:486-491.Â
- Marchino GL, Gigante V, Gennarelli G, et al. Salpingoscopic and laparoscopic investigations in relation to fertility outcome. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001; 8:218-
- Novy M, Thurmond AS, Patton P, Uchida BT, Rosch J. Diagnosis of cornual obstruction by transcervical fallopiantube cannulation. Fertil Steril 1988; 50:434-40.
- Richman TS, Viscomi GN, Decherney AH, et al. Fallopian tube pathency assessed by ultrasound following fluid injection. Radiology1984;152:507-10.
- Holz K, Becker R, Schurmann R. Ultrasound in the investigation of tubal patency. A meta-analysis of three comparative studies of Echovist-200 including 1007 women. Zentralbl Gynakol 1997; 119:366-73.
- Chung JP, Haines CJ, Kong GW. Long-term reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic proximal tubal cannulation - an outcome analysis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;5:470-475.Â
- Gleicher N, Karande V 1996 The diagnosis and treatment of proximal tubal disease. Human Reproduction 11,1823-1834.
- Papaioannou S, Afnan M, Girling AJ et al. 2002b The learning curve of selective salpingography and tubal catheterisation. Fertility and Sterility 77, 1049-1052.Â
- Pyra K, Szmygin M, Dymara-Konopka W, Zych A, Sojka M, Jargiełło T, Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B. The pregnancy rate of infertile patients with proximal tubal obstruction 12 months following selective salpingography andtubal catheterization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:164-169
- Kodaman H, Arici A, Seli E. Evidence-based diagnosis and management of tubal factor infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004;16:221-9
- Anil G, Tay KH, Loh SF, Yong TT, Ong CL, Tan BS. Fluoroscopy-guided, transcervical, selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalisation. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) 2011;31:746-50.Â
- De Silva PM, Chu JJ, Gallos ID, Vidyasagar AT, Robinson L, Coomarasamy A. Fallopian tube catheterization in the treatment of proximal tubal obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):836-852.